IBSi Blogs

The rise of Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) is a logical next step in fuelling efficiency across existing customer journeys. Rather than diverting buyers to separate channels to complete online purchases, for instance, brands that have already built strong brand recognition can instead cross-sell financial services like credit to already engaged consumers.

by Paddy Vishani, Strategic Partnerships Manager, Yobota

As a result of innovation and growth in embedded finance business models, non-financial brands can now extend credit and other banking services to their customers without having to obtain a regulatory licence – while offering the same protections that come with being a fully regulated bank.

According to PwC, the new revenue potential generated through open banking-enabled SME business and retail customer propositions in the UK was £500 million in 2018. By 2024, Insider Intelligence predicts that this figure will reach £1.9 billion.

Even though the opportunity is compelling, however, there are a few nuances to navigate as banks, BaaS providers and businesses consider forging long-term partnerships.

A winning BaaS partnership

White labelling in financial services is not a new concept; branded credit cards, for instance, have been used by businesses for many years to build customer loyalty. Yet the role of white labelling in the BaaS space is far more involved.

Through flexible plug-and-play application programming interfaces (APIs), banking platform services allow brands to directly tap into the infrastructure of their chosen bank. This means that core elements like risk management, compliance and servicing are all supported.

Importantly, leading BaaS providers will enable businesses to create differentiated offerings, giving businesses the ability not just to implement off-the-shelf banking solutions, but also to curate novel products. Beyond customising the user interface to reflect their brand, the modular architecture of banking platform services empowers businesses to customise, adjust and replace the core components they need at any given point in time. The importance of choosing the right provider thereby becomes apparent.

A BaaS platform must be able to do a number of things. Firstly, it must protect the bank by demonstrating that it can reliably ringfence the clients, their data, and all the processes which will be utilised by different businesses. Core banking vendors should have a proven track record in supporting regulated products, and ideally a leadership team consisting of both technology and banking specialists that are well-versed in regulatory requirements.

The platform must also be designed in a way that offers easy access to all the critical functions provided by the bank: the entry points (usually in the form of an API) must be optimally designed to give businesses the tools they need to realise their vision. The design and flexibility of the architecture are key: BaaS platforms must be extensible and scalable to meet future use cases as customer expectations evolve.

A key component of this is that the representation of financial products should be unbounded. Whether businesses are looking to introduce a variable APR that is dynamically linked to an individual’s credit score, or a savings account that pays interest into an environmental fund, an agile solution is needed to support the long-term evolution of banking products.

Embracing the art of the possible

Embedded banking is increasing the appetite for innovative, tech-driven solutions to solve common pain points across the customer journey. By solving the technical hurdles, BaaS providers like Yobota empower businesses to spin out user-centric offerings that they can run independently.

Sophisticated BaaS solutions should also be able to deliver granular insights into how end customers are interacting with products. Reporting APIs that generate real-time data will enable businesses to continually assess and adapt to industry trends and customer behaviours. Equipped with this knowledge, brands can curate experiences that are truly relevant to their customers’ needs.

The rise of BaaS will no doubt serve to inspire new products and fill unexplored niches in the market. The importance of strategic partnerships, however, cannot be overlooked as banks, providers and businesses set their sights on the new realm of possibilities.

The overall progress of a region depends on equal opportunities for everyone without any discrimination or preference. When women of a country are empowered, it drives economic growth and development and creates life lessons for young female entrepreneurs to drive their business ideas. Even though the government has come up with many initiatives to promote entrepreneurship in the country, there are a few hurdles for people (especially women) to put their ideas into action.

bu of Abhinav Sinha, Co-Founder, Eko

Lack of finance options is one of the most crucial roadblocks women entrepreneurs face in India. As the role of FinTech companies has expanded significantly in the past few years, one can expect that these firms will drive entrepreneurship among women in the country. There are different ways through which FinTech firms would enable young women entrepreneurs in their entrepreneurship journey.

Understanding the constraints in access to financial institutions

Financial inclusion is crucial for the entrepreneurship journey of any individual. The concept of financial inclusion refers to the accumulation of savings, accessing financial institutions to invest, and availing various services provided by such organizations. In respect of entrepreneurship, it is crucial to understand that having a business idea and executing the same on any level is a key to this process. Rather than thinking about being a start-up or a unicorn, the most crucial aspect is to get the idea going by initiating a business. However, despite having many ideas, women entrepreneurs fail to execute them at the micro-levels.

Besides being discriminated against gender, financial institutions often do not take women entrepreneurs seriously, and they fail to secure adequate funding to sustain their business ventures. This not only puts brakes on their operations but also poses a significant hurdle in their entrepreneurial journey. Here, FinTech companies can play a significant role in reaching the end-users without the need to have a comprehensive infrastructure (physical).

Hence, from availing of finance to getting investment tips, women entrepreneurs can connect with a FinTech company and start their journeys. Aside from motivating more women to jumpstart their entrepreneurial stints, closing the gender gap will increase 35% of GDP (approximately) and benefit the macroeconomics gains of a country in a significant manner.

Integration of FinTech, financial inclusion, and government initiatives

The government’s efforts in promoting entrepreneurship through easing finance availability are often underappreciated. Several initiatives have started with the introduction of UPI (Unified Payment Interface) along with PMJDY and the Direct Benefit Transfer scheme, due to which FinTech firms have reached almost all parts of the country. Apart from them, the government has set up INR 10,000 crore fund (as a VC) for the MSME sector, allocated INR 20,000 crore to launch a specialized bank (Mudra Bank) for the SME sector, and earmarked INR 1000 crore to empower the financial dreams of start-ups.

These initiatives remove the middleman and facilities person-to-merchant transactions (offline & digital), promoting financial inclusion. With the increased volumes of digital payments and easing the due diligence requirements, FinTech companies have ensured that women will be educated about government initiatives, and becoming a beneficiary of such schemes would no longer be a bureaucratic process.

Improved financial inclusion for women entrepreneurs

Different studies have suggested that the overall trend of savings and investments among women in India has improved with increased usage of mobile apps, wallets, and platforms. With a friendly regional interface, FinTech firms work closely with women entrepreneurs to reduce their reliance on text and western iconography.

Voice-based and banking-plus solutions like savings and health insurance allow people without technical competency to operate businesses (like Kirana stores) more effortlessly. In a way, FinTech companies are promoting micro-entrepreneurship by facilitating small and microfinance, more accessible credit, and quick resolution of their financial requirements and queries. The overall time required to avail such services has reduced considerably, and with UIDAI-supported platforms, women entrepreneurs can use mobile banking solutions (MFS) if integrated with microfinance institutions (MFIs).

Summing up

FinTech companies in India have a significant role in promoting women entrepreneurship at micro and macro levels. These firms understand the challenges female business owners face in executing their ideas. Hence, by providing finance and supporting government initiatives, these FinTech companies will ensure better financial inclusion and address the core business issues that women are often deprived of.

Cryptocurrencies are one of the biggest Ponzi schemes in history. More stringent regulation and the rise of state-backed digital currencies look set to cause the speculative market for cryptocurrencies to crash. Within a few years, all non-state backed cryptocurrencies could reach their true monetary value: zero.

by Bambos Tsiattalou, Partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors

Although cryptocurrencies are still involved in white collar crime, the writing is on the wall for them. Dedicated regulatory regimes for cryptocurrencies are now being developed worldwide. The European Commission has launched a proposed regulatory regime for cryptoassets. The US Senate looks set to require cryptocurrency exchanges to report the details of each transaction. This is expected to be in force by 2023. In the meantime, regulators are making greater use of their existing powers to regulate cryptocurrencies. For example, the UK’s the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) was appointed as the major regulator of the cryptocurrency market in January 2021.

Perhaps the greatest long-term threat to cryptocurrencies is the creation of state-backed digital currencies. China is now trialling its digital Yuan. The EU is considering a digital euro.  The chair of the Federal Reserve calls its proposed digital dollar a “high priority project”. These will have both the security of blockchain and a stable value.

Despite these developments, for now, cryptocurrencies continue to provide opportunities for criminal activity, including white collar crime. The global cryptocurrency market is now worth some US$1.5 trillion annually. New types of cryptoassets and cryptocurrency exchanges launch regularly.

The determination of global leaders to regulate cryptocurrencies should not be underestimated.  Ransomware attacks are now a geopolitical issue, with many linked to Russia. Russia has been accused of involvement in attacks such as the 2020 SolarWinds attack. The 2021 G7 meeting issued a final communique that promised that the G7 nations would collaborate “to urgently address the escalating shared threat” of ransomware attacks. The greater anonymity of cryptocurrencies facilitates ransomware attacks.

Frauds involving cryptocurrencies, such as the PlusToken Ponzi scheme, have cost billions internationally. The PlusToken fraud defrauded investors of an estimated $2.9 billion. Cryptocurrencies have facilitated money laundering on a global scale. Until serious regulatory regimes are put in place globally, the use of cryptocurrencies in white collar crime looks set to continue. In 2020, in the UK alone, around £113 million was lost in fraudulent cryptocurrency investments.

A great deal of white collar crime goes beyond money laundering and relates to the cryptoasset markets themselves. It involves misrepresentations regarding the value, stability and viability of cryptoassets and related financial instruments.

People are lured into investing online in cryptocurrencies or their derivatives. This is despite the clear warnings issued by regulators such as the FCA. The FCA’s clear advice is that “Cryptoassets are considered very high risk, speculative purchases. If you buy cryptoassets, you should be prepared to lose all your money.”

The appetite for cryptocurrencies is rarely dented by their remarkable volatility. Earlier this year, the cryptocurrency Ether dropped 22% in a single day while Bitcoin lost over 40% of its value in a single week. The FCA has thankfully now banned the sale of crypto derivatives to consumers on the basis of its “concerns surrounding the volatility and valuation of the underlying cryptoassets.” Yet UK consumers can still buy them internationally online.

The UK has no regulatory regime dedicated to cryptocurrencies as of yet. However, the FCA has become active in regulating the cryptocurrency market. Firms must now register with the FCA before operating in the UK. Cryptoasset platforms which registered with the FCA in December 2020 were able to continue to offer services in the UK under a Temporary Registrations Regime while the FCA assessed their application. However, many applicants have been abandoning their applications to the FCA, due to difficulties meeting the anti-money laundering requirements.

The FCA has not been sitting on its hands while it assesses applications. In June, it banned the cryptocurrency exchange Binance from conducting regulated activities in the UK. The FCA’s head of enforcement and market oversight, Mark Steward has admitted that 111 unregistered cryptocurrency providers were operating in Britain and that “they are dealing with someone: banks, payment services firm, consumers”. This is a pointed warning to those banks and other white collar service providers involved.

The British legal system has proven itself adaptable to the rise of cryptocurrencies. In 2019, the English High Court considered whether cryptoassets could be legally regarded as property. The case of AA v Persons Unknown [2020] 4 W.L.R. 35 involved an application for a proprietary injunction to recover Bitcoins, which had been extorted during a ransomware attack on a Canadian insurance company. The company’s British insurer paid q ransom of $950,000 in Bitcoin through an expert intermediary. At the time this amounted to 109.25 Bitcoins.

The consultants who had made the payment found the extorted Bitcoins at a cryptocurrency exchange.  They discovered that 96 of the 109.25 Bitcoins were still in an account and asked the High Court to grant a proprietary injunction to recover them. The English High Court held that Bitcoins were “property” under English law and granted the injunction.

The court favourably cited the UK Jurisdiction Task Force’s report entitled “Legal statement on cryptoassets and smart contracts”.  The report concluded that cryptoassets have the legal characteristics of property and that their novel technological features did not prevent them from legally being property. This judgment brings cryptoassets within the purview of the English courts.

Regulators and the courts are actively using existing laws to tackle cryptocurrencies and white collar crime. State-backed digital currencies look set to arrive in tandem with a coming wave of regulation which will tackle the misuse of crypto assets. These developments will create a perfect storm that will sweep away cryptocurrencies as we have known them.

People will be much more likely to place their trust in a digital dollar or a digital euro instead of a cryptocurrency like Dogecoin – which literally started off as a joke. It may well also end up as one.

A day in the crypto market is often the equivalent of a week in real life, due to its volatile, unpredictable nature. So what could a whole new year bring to the big table?

by Vlad Faraon, CBO and Co-founder, Coreto

Plenty of changes, we hope, as cryptocurrencies are now becoming mainstream. But their popularity doesn’t come without risks. The crypto market value blew past $3 trillion, according to CoinGecko pricing, but the scams are on the rise as well. In just 6 months, between October 2020 – March 2021, over 7,000 people lost more than $80millions by investing in altcoins according to The Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The amount was 10 times smaller in the previous year.

Despite its rapid growth and severe caveats, the crypto transactions aren’t currently regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This means that the industry is a minefield, full of unethical players. Under these circumstances, people should never invest more than they’re willing to lose.

This month, regulatory agencies issued a joint statement driven by the concern that ‘the emerging crypto-asset sector presents potential opportunities and risks for banking organisations, their customers, and the overall financial system.’ The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) analysed various issues regarding crypto assets and are aiming to provide coordinated and timely clarity. They believe that it’s necessary to use a common vocabulary, identify the key risks and analyse the applicability of existing regulations and guidance. This sets expectations for more consumer protection and a standard the whole industry can adhere to.

In addition to this, the OCC published a letter about how national banks and federal savings associations should implement safety measures before undertaking certain cryptocurrency and stablecoin activities. They suggested controls that include engaging with their supervisory office to show written notification of their proposed activities, alongside the criteria that the OCC will use for the evaluation, with a view to providing a supervisory non-objection.

All this progress is welcome, as at a macro level they’re meant to protect the interests of the investor. But the way things developed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has the same goal, makes us want to take this with a pinch of salt.

On one hand, the SEC is looking after people’s money, but on the other, it wants to make the market more efficient. Catering for both is a challenging job, and some might say that it became too protective as an institution and got in the way of progress. See what happened to Basis, for example, designed to keep its price stable. This would have been an innovative solution for the crypto space, coming from a place of accountability and transparency. The project was however shut down because of strict, old regulations applied to a novel system. In its desire to go after scams, frauds and manipulative activity, it discourages entrepreneurs from launching new projects. This is one of the reasons why London, not New York, is the centre of fintech investments now.

With the industry’s rapid advancement there is a growing need for regulations that are agile and flexible. As the SEC might be directing its enforcement actions against DeFi, NFTs and even stablecoins, revising its modus operandi is required sooner rather than later.

While policy-makers are slowly devising their roadmaps to a healthier ecosystem, the industry could regulate itself by relying on trust and knowledge. The harsh reality is that in the crypto space there are many bad actors. We believe there is little to no chance that there are retail investors out there who didn’t experience scams or at least somebody trying to scam them. For the retail investor to have more confidence in this space, there is a high need for a tracked record system for projects, influencers, and anyone with a voice in this space. We can’t trust someone with our investment decisions just because they have a big following. Retail investors shouldn’t base their confidence on that. It’s important to understand that a tracked record of past performance, immutably stored on the blockchain, is a step forward towards building the trust bridge in 2022.

The same trust and knowledge lie at the heart of Coreto, our reputation-based research hub, which is a secure environment for crypto communities. Here, members have to prove their influencer status by building a history of accurate analysis and market predictions. This will elevate critical thinking, reasoned argument, shared knowledge, and verifiable facts. Only when they’ll have a good enough reputation score will they be able to influence the newcomers, and also monetise their knowledge. This is significantly different from what happens currently online, with some so-called crypto influencers misleading masses into faulty investments and then fleeing the scene. This creates a win-win situation: the goodwill influencers will be able to shine on a digital stage, while the community will be able to make more educated investment decisions.

If we all remain loyal to these guiding principles – trust and performance – the whole crypto community can benefit and evolve from it.

Adopting digital identities could provide a significant boost to not only the future of open finance, but also across the economy more broadly.

by Brian Costello, VP Data Strategy, Envestnet | Yodlee

One challenge that is evident following the introduction of Open Banking in the UK is consumer hesitancy to share financial data, which is required to access the Open Banking-powered products and services the consumer wants or needs. For the next step beyond Open Banking – open finance – to be a success the industry needs to overcome the data sharing trust challenge to unlock the benefits personalised open finance services can provide.

To show the scale of the challenge, an independent survey of UK adults, commissioned by Envestnet | Yodlee, found that two-thirds of consumers in the UK would find it easier and desirable to view all of their financial information in one place, highlighting the huge demand for open finance. However, when it comes to actually sharing the data, the challenge presents itself. While more than a third of respondents said they would be willing to share their financial data, which would enable these kinds of services, a similar number said they would not be willing to, and a quarter were uncertain.

Open finance stands to benefit everyday users in many ways. The Citizens Advice Bureau noted that in the UK, consumers are overpaying £3.4 billion in key areas including mobile, broadband, home insurance, cash savings and mortgages. A well-managed open finance initiative has the potential to drive innovation in financial wellness platforms, helping users understand their financial behaviours and how they could make improvements. This would also enable accessible financial advice, as advisors are able to gain a view of a person’s overall financial picture in a fraction of the time it currently takes.

Transparency and control are two key principles for any data sharing economy, and therefore essential for an effective and safe open finance environment. As it stands, users are required to grant separate consents to both the recipient and provider of their data, and sometimes to a third party as well. Though these levels of protection are laudable, the current user experience is highly procedural and can confuse the user to the point they abandon the consent experience. The requirement to grant multiple consents is at odds with the user experience of trying to achieve a singular cohesive outcome.

Could digital identities simplify the consent process and align consent with desired outcomes?

The UK’s National Data Strategy found that for data to have the most effective impact, it needs to be appropriately collected, accessible, portable, and re-usable. However, achieving this would likely involve enabling consumers to provide more overarching consent for data-sharing, whilst still maintaining stringent protections and avenues for redress. This is no easy feat, and there is still discussion between regulators and the industry on the best ways to achieve this.

The ideal situation is a single digital identity artifact with consent attributes that provides all parties in the data sharing transaction with enforceable evidence of the user’s explicit instructions. Once a digital ID is verified, data-sharing consents attributable to a person’s digital identity could enable them to assign consent to multiple parties involved in the data sharing process without experiencing the confusion and disruption that the current user journey typically entails.

Beyond simplifying the user journey, standardisation of certain consumer consents could enable users to incorporate ongoing consents to their digital ID, which would enable them to give permission to share their data with organisations in real-time or when they were not active in the user experience.

Another option is to leverage the current system of federated identity management providers by having those data providers become the sole identity provider for the transaction.  The Global Assured Identity Network is proposing just that, with ambitions to open the framework up across all sectors.

While this is a great opportunity with many upsides, there are many things standing in its way encompassing technical infrastructure, regulations, and conflicting points of view.

Provided there was a regulatory framework in place, these ongoing consents could also enable users to automatically share their data with new providers under specific circumstances. These sort of outcome-focused smart consents would enable many consumers to benefit from the data sharing economy and reap enormous benefits, without needing to engage too heavily with the procedural elements of data sharing.

Most people associate the word ‘blockchain’ with cryptocurrency and given the amount of press coverage the latter has received, particularly in the last two years, it may seem that the two are indistinguishable, but that is not the case.

by Mario Galatovic, Vice President Products & Alliances, Utimaco 

Blockchain is ultimately a means of storing information, no different in some respects from an Excel file, SQL database, or even a hard drive. The major difference is that this technology is distributed over a network of peers called ‘nodes’. Each entry in a blockchain contains a cryptographic hash linking it to previous blocks in a chain, meaning that once data is recorded it cannot be altered without altering all subsequent blocks.

Given their high level of security, blockchains have been mooted as a solution for a range of problems, and despite the ‘wild west’ reputation that it has due to some spectacular security breaches in cryptocurrency trading, major companies like IBM are using it in applications ranging from trade finance to vaccine distribution.

One key application that would solve a huge number of problems is that of identity: identity theft is a growing problem, and proving identity is a difficult task that places a huge administrative burden on companies and individuals. Before getting a loan, buying a house or starting a business an individual has to prove their identity, and this can be an onerous task, particularly if you are one of the 1.7 billion people in the world without a bank account, one of the world’s 82.4 million refugees or an undocumented migrant.

So how might blockchain technology help create digital identities, and how might they be secured?

Opportunities and challenges for digital identities on the blockchain

The idea of creating a secure digital identity isn’t new, but the need for it is becoming more pressing by the year, as more problems with our current system of disconnected digital and analogue documents certified by multiple authorities become apparent. A so-called ‘Good Digital Identity’ was one of the pillars of the 2018 World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, aimed at creating ‘a new chapter in the social contract’. Worldwide the market for identity services is expected to reach $14.82 billion this year, and the administrative and social costs of the difficulty of proving identity is impossible to estimate but likely to be much higher.

Real-world applications of this technology already exist: the UMHCR already uses blockchain technology to distribute food to refugees based on biometric data, and it is possible that the technology could be used to prevent the estimated $40 billion in corruption caused by aid not reaching the people it is intended for. Both applications depend on identity: being able to link a person’s iris scan to a ledger of when they last received food aid and being able to ensure that payments reach a particular person or agency and no others.

There are also uses for this technology that could become more widespread: international travel could be sped up considerably by having digital instead of analogue passports, as anyone who has lost a passport before travelling could tell you. Background checks when applying for sensitive job roles could also be done instantly as opposed to through contacting multiple agencies. Transferring healthcare information internationally, which often involves fax machines, would also speed up considerably.

Returning to the subject of cryptocurrency, despite the security inherent to storing financial information on the blockchain, many cryptocurrency users have either had their wallets compromised or simply lost the passwords for them because there is no way to connect that wallet to their physical identity. If you forget the PIN for your bank card it can be reset because there is always a ‘you’ to connect that account to, but if a cryptocurrency wallet that can be accessed with only a username and password is lost then it could be gone for good. A robust digital identity system could solve this problem.

How blockchain can secure identity

Blockchain technology is a sensible way to achieve a ‘good’ digital identity. Although there have been concerns about speed when applied in the cryptocurrency space, where making a payment or transfer can take considerable time as the blockchain works through a backlog, blockchain technology is potentially very fast, and being ‘centralised’ (in the sense of all being in one blockchain) means that auditing information will be much faster and tamper-proof. Being decentralised, an identity blockchain could be accessed from anywhere but would be extremely secure: for example, if you were applying for a loan online you could grant the lender access to the details they need and nothing more, just as when you sign up to a service with Facebook it will tell you that it will have access to your friends and so on.

When applying for a new job you could allow access to your work history but not your medical record, when having a check-up with a doctor you could grant access to medical records but not your work history. Because each granting of access would be a ‘transaction’ on the blockchain you would have oversight on who has access to which elements of your digital identity, and this system could even use smart contracts to allow time-limited or conditional access to certain records.

There is also the matter of security. Blockchain technology is innately more secure than other information storage technologies because of the very fact of it being a ‘chain’ – you cannot go back and alter a piece of information, deleting the record of a payment so that it ‘never happened’ for example. Although it would be very difficult, this would be hypothetically possible in current forms of data storage – your bank balance is effectively a number in a spreadsheet. Blockchain technology wouldn’t allow for this, making it ideal for highly sensitive applications like identity.

Of course, blockchains can and have been compromised, so they will need to be secured with similar technology to that which secures more traditional information storage. Public and private keys backed by strong, quantum-safe cryptography generated by hardware security modules will enhance the safety of blockchains and allow for the creation of secure digital identities.

Historically, accounting software has been designed to help finance teams manage time-costly tasks, improve accuracy, and counter the repetition of month-end tasks needed to close the books. The pitfalls of this approach and the focus on the ‘task’ has resulted in models that have made it more difficult for accounting professionals to rise above the numbers. In other words, software tools have traditionally placed an outsized focus on the minute details of closing tasks which have stymied accounting professionals, ensuring better accuracy, and visibility at the expense of a more analytical interpretation of the financial data.

by Mike Whitmire, Co-Founder and CEO, FloQast 

Conditions are optimal for software that provides a more elevated approach. A new trend emerging within the sector is that accounting is increasingly intertwined with and responsible for the business operations function. This occurs by virtue of the fact that accounting underpins the ability to operationally run a smooth department and, more importantly, the entire company.

Unquestionably, this trend has been accelerated by the pandemic, where teams have become remote and increasingly siloed from one another. In functions such as accounting, there is an important need for collaboration and transparency when it comes to completing functions around the month end. Controllers were faced with a greater challenge than ever before, how to maintain collaboration and communication remotely?

It’s no surprise, therefore, that the pandemic has also increased the need for cloud-based solutions to engender better communication across distributed teams. Tech of this kind has taken centre stage, proving its utility in enabling simple processes, such as end of the month, to be completed more efficiently, giving way for accountants to increase their focus on much needed strategy and agile thinking during such unprecedented times.

The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning technology has helped automate the ‘low hanging fruit’ functions with modern accounting software allowing finance professionals to apply their human intelligence to solving higher level problems. In essence, when the small stuff is automated, individuals can better see the forest, without having their field of vision obscured by the individual trees. However, in order to achieve this level of focus, it is important that the software used is intelligently designed to enable it.  At its heart, software needs to be informed by the people doing the job, in this case, the accounting team. This way it can address and solve the very real day-to-day challenges and become indispensable, whilst freeing up time of the controller to enable strategic thinking.

Taking the time to consider practical use cases and listening to customer challenges is also equally important for software design. Companies will often start using accounting software as a way to optimise accounting functions alone but may move beyond that, wanting more from their software. For example, by offering a way to collaborate and provide transparency around any process under the function of the controller.

Understanding and delivering on customers’ needs should be a fundamental driving force behind any accounting software and will lead to greater credibility for the product. Likewise, an ability to free senior finance professionals from the burden of repetitive, number-crunching tasks will enable them to open their eyes, offering strategic input to fuel improved decision making, and ultimately lead to stronger business performance.

IBS Intelligence is partnering with Sopra Banking Software to promote the Sopra Banking Summit, which takes place 18-22 October 2021. The summit is tackling the biggest issues in the financial sector. This weeklong festival of FinTech will touch on the hottest topics in financial services and highlight the new paths industry leaders are taking.

The following article was originally published here.

Regulatory reporting is a key part of the framework contributing to stability within the banking system. This is fundamental, as the sector’s business activity generates significant risk, which can affect the economy and its stakeholders, such as consumers, companies and governments. That’s why banking activity is regulated. Banks are required to report standardised information to supervisory bodies, known as regulatory reporting.

by Aurélie Béreau Adélise, Product Marketing Manager for SBP, Sopra Banking Software

While the delivery of reports may be transactional, periodic and calendar-based, the requirements can emanate from separate legislative and banking bodies, even though all these stakeholders have the same objectives:

• Ensuring monetary and financial stability
• Promoting international cooperation and transparency
• Protecting customers

However, the notion of regulatory reporting is very broad and covers a variety of obligations, the requirements of which are constantly expanding. This complicates the burden on financial institutions and increases the cost of maintaining their compliance.

Today’s stakeholders believe that the current regulatory reporting system, following several attempts at harmonisation within the framework of European integration, is no longer fit for purpose. This has led European companies to agree on the implementation of a new reporting system: integrated reporting.

New proposals following attempts at harmonisation

The European Central Bank (ECB), responsible for compiling reports for statistical purposes, has been trying to harmonise its reporting requirements for some years. Corep and Finrep were the first reports to be standardised within the various EU countries, starting in 2007. Next came AnaCredit in 2019, along with the advent of granularity and the emergence of new technologies enabling the analysis and exploitation of large data sets. And finally, BIRD (Banks’ Integrated Reporting Dictionary) – a collaborative project that’s still ongoing between the ECB, National Central Banks (NCBs) and commercial banks, which aims to define a shared set of transformations for regulatory reporting purposes.

Today, the ECB would like to move toward more granularity and has launched an overhaul of its requirements via its Integrated REporting Framework (IREF) project, which should be completed by the end of 2024. It launched a ‘cost-benefit’ investigation, completed on April 16, to assess the relevance of the main scenario it would like to implement. This survey was sent to the entire industry, including national banks, commercial banks, banking associations and software providers.

Similarly, the European Banking Authority (EBA), in charge of collecting financial and risk data as part of the banking industry’s single supervisory mechanism, launched a public inquiry from March 11 to June 11. The inquiry aimed to assess the implementation of the IREF counterpart on the prudential and resolution part of the project, called the Integrated REporting System (IRES). This project has made less progress than the ECB project, so there is a question as to how the ECB and EBA projects will eventually converge.

While the EBA has not yet disclosed the next steps for the implementation of harmonised reporting, the ECB foresees the transition to integrated IREF reporting between 2024 and 2027 in the area of statistics – monetary, AnaCredit and securities holding, in particular.

Is integrated reporting the final step in regulatory reporting?

In recent years, the number of new reports has grown exponentially. And each new addition requires work, expense and time. The idea of an integrated reporting system that brings all the information together in one place is therefore attractive, but only if it does not follow the same dynamic as the previous ones. These questions must be answered in the coming years to ensure an effective and rapid transition.

As with every other sector and industry post Covid-19, the Indian banking system has also become increasingly hybrid. However, the banking system is one of the first sectors to have experienced consistent digitisation, even before the onslaught of social distancing and mandatory lockdowns. The banking and financial services industry in India has undergone a transformative phase over the last ten years, with lending and banking models witnessing sea changes and coming into their own in the information age.

by Kamal Sharma, Head – Business Development (Regulatory Practice), Profinch 

The Technology Disruption

The Indian banking landscape has seen major changes, especially over the last two to three years. In fact, 2019 was the first year wherein Indian fintech companies surpassed global counterparts when it came to raising funds, attesting to the strength of the Indian banking demographic. United Payments Interface has, since then, become omnipresent, with even the smallest tea shops and snacks centres flaunting the ubiquitous QR code which allows Indians to make transactions and payments without carrying cumbersome wallets or debit cards.

Digital payments have risen steadily, and the banking system has transformed itself into a digitally mighty entity further supported by the rising presence of neobanks offering online-only services to new-age customers. While the industry was developing steadily, the pandemic turned into the ultimate catalyst for the hybrid movement, prompting people to forego physical visits and turn to their phones and laptops to access bank accounts and complete transactions.

With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) increasingly widening the horizon of data capture from Indian banks, this blog focussed on RBI’s mandates for one of India’s growing Banking sectors – Urban Co-operative Banks.

Automation for UCBs

RBI recently implemented Centralized Information Management System (CIMS) to replace their existing Data Warehouse system. The objective of CIMS is to collect and process all returns from regulated entities and various Central Office Departments of RBI. RBI intends regulated entities to build a system to help their data flow automatically from their IT system to CIMS without any scope of manual intervention. After its thorough research on the automation/integration of a sample of banks, RBI announced CIMS in 2020. As of now, CIMS has reached its advanced stage. RBI has also released a web portal called Staging Area Data Portal (SADP) which is for the distribution of system-to-system software components of CIMS. Technically speaking, CIMS architecture is made of four layers; namely, Data Collection, Data Governance, Big Data repository and Centralized Integrated Analytics. The functionality would work by collecting data from multiple channels and by including a system-to-system automatic interface, file upload, API, web-screen and a few other components.  Top 14 Indian UCBs have been selected by DoS to implement data collection for the system-to-system channel for CIMS. These UCBs will be responsible for building a central data repository and all their returns will also be generated in XML/XBRL format as specified by the RBI.

With widespread digital transformation of banks, there is a need for stringent norms and regulatory oversight. Indian lenders, including Urban Cooperative Banks or UCBs, must initiate detailed regulatory reporting to ensure compliance with all statutes and this leads to the generation of a tremendous volume of data. Combing through the generated data and culling out insights becomes a tough task for the UCBs and their employees and this is one more avenue where technology offers a helping hand, furthering the digitisation drive. Software aimed at creating automated data flows and centralised information and management systems are coming to the aid of UCBs that are burdened by regulatory requirements. It is also wise for banks to use their Automated Data Flow/CIMS system to help their business reporting and other MIS requirements. It helps then convert its RBI investments into a business centre and not just turn into a cost centre. Banks can also utilize the additional value, like customer insights/spending patterns/demographic/gender/age base customer analysis, that will come from this architectural change.

The RBI is keen on digitising the banking sector and, accordingly, the central bank in August 2021 directed UCBs with assets worth 2000 crore rupees and above to implement system-based asset classification from June 30 onwards this year. Following the mandate, asset classification, including both upgrading and downgrading would be carried out by computerised systems, in a fully automated manner, mitigating possibilities of human error. The move is aimed at enhancing efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the process and is a definitive stride towards digitisation and technology adoption.

Requirements for Smooth Implementation

While regulations and mandates provide a roadmap, it is up to the UCBs and service providers to ensure that the mandate on automation is carried out successfully. The RBI has advised concerned UCBs to conduct pilot/parallel runs and evaluate the results for accuracy/integrity of the asset classification to ensure that implementation of the system proceeds smoothly. Further, the central bank has also stated that UCBs not meeting the criteria can also voluntarily implement the framework in their own interest. It is in this scenario that technology solutions and service providers come to the fore to enable UCBs in meeting regulatory demands and requirements.

For instance, fintech companies are now offering banks pre-built frameworks for automated data flows, ensuring faster download of latest templates configured using business rules and in-built calculations. Such systems facilitate data integration across sources and aid collaboration among valid users. Further, innovative solutions empower UCBs to respond to regulatory questions on calculation methodology and reporting values by offering drill downs, configurable business logic definition screens and the capability to upload supporting documents and re-generate old reports with previously submitted data. Audit trails for easy traceability is another service offered by such solutions.

With the amalgamation of automation and stringent regulatory mandates, UCBs, and the Indian banking ecosystem at large, are on their way to a more efficient, accurate, and transparent future – while offering customers the best of digitisation, convenience, and security.

VRP APIs are being implemented by the UK’s 9 largest banks to enable customers to freely sweep money between their accounts following a ruling by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) in July. In practice, that could help people avoid overdraft fees or increase their automated savings.

by Kat Cloud, UK Policy Lead, Plaid

This is a major step forward and a win for both consumers and businesses as the CMA continues to create more competition across the banking sector. Through this change, consumers and business owners can feel more confident in their money management without fearing unnecessary, not to mention avoidable, charges.

What are VRPs?

Like a direct debit, where a business is able to collect recurring payments from the same customer without permission for every payment, VRPs offer businesses and consumers a similar process through open banking. Banks integrating the VRP API will enable third party providers (TPPs) to initiate variable payments at variable times, without getting the permission from the consumer every single time. As with the overarching mission for open banking, VRPs are intended to create a seamless and frictionless experience for customers.

One of the most common use cases of VRP APIs is sweeping, also known as me-to-me payments, which use TPPs accessibility across different accounts to understand where people can seamlessly transfer money from one account to another. From a consumer perspective, there are many practical applications for this, such as transferring money into an account to prevent dipping into an overdraft therefore avoiding fees, or topping up a savings account by transferring the leftover cash from a coffee purchase.

How can VRP APIs help to eradicate financial vulnerability?

The VRP mandate is the latest move in protecting customers while helping them to lead healthier financial lives. Indeed, as open banking continues to foster an environment where consumers and businesses have access to a wide range of financial products and services, the VRP API is the next step in creating a seamless financial ecosystem that reduces stress, confusion and saves time.

For those in a vulnerable financial situation, the VRP mandate will help them to monitor and manage their accounts. For example, if a consumer has insufficient funds in one account, VRP APIs can transfer money over from another account to prevent them entering an overdraft. Given its smart nature, the API has the capability to move money seamlessly, without constant permissions. In turn this helps prevent consumers from being charged high overdraft fees and penalties, all while creating a pathway to a more secure financial situation.

What’s next?

Once again, the UK is leading the pack against its EU counterparts in creating a fairer financial system through the power of technology, while at the same time maintaining the central ethos of open banking – putting the consumer back at the heart of the financial ecosystem.

Looking ahead, VRPs will certainly have broader use cases in the future. As the process is like direct debit payments, we can expect to see variable payments for utilities bills, investment accounts, subscriptions and more. As we continue to transition towards open finance, the VRP ruling is an important step in promoting financial democracy while helping to eradicate financial vulnerability.